Just over a year ago, the International Institute for the Study of Cuba (IISC) was established at London Metropolitan University. The business plan that we produced to support the proposal started with the question: Why Cuba? Why Now? Since our initial proposal (in 2006) Fidel Castro became seriously ill and transferred the presidency to his brother Raoul. In February 2008 Fidel announced his retirement, Raoul was elected President and the beginning of changes both political and economic are emerging cautiously from Havana. At the same time, with almost orchestrated irony, the US Presidential primary campaign has captivated world headlines and has thrust forward as potential US presidents, a young black male, a seasoned white female, and a septuagenarian war veteran.
How does our original rationale for Why Cuba? Why Now? match up to these geo-political changes and would we now write a different proposal to the one we outlined in May 2007? This is what we wrote:
Our central question, then as now, is this:
"What lessons can Western and other societies learn from interrogating and analysing the Cuban social experience?"
Currently, governmental policies towards Cuba on both sides of the Atlantic seem to be, to differing degrees, predicated on the assumption that the Cuban Revolution will be transformed dramatically and move further towards free market capitalism once its chief architect, Fidel Castro, is no longer on the scene. There is apparently no planning for the possibility that the Cuban regime might not essentially change - or that it might become more radically socialist.
Persisting U.S. antagonism towards socialism in Cuba and other parts of Latin America is potentially a source of instability and even conflict in the region. Cuba demands attention in its own right as a key element in this context. With Cuba now enjoying the benefits of a close alliance with oil-rich Venezuela and a deepening trade and investment relationship with a booming China, there is every prospect that the Cuban economy might continue its fast growth of recent years, possibly making a political change towards liberalism in the island less, rather than more, likely.
There is the need for a deeper and better-focused study of these factors, to help inform policy makers and the business community in the coming decade about Cuba's position and its implications for the Caribbean and Latin America. It is our view that this study requires a holistic approach, which can only be undertaken within an academic centre beyond the confines of the US-Cuba divide and with the rigour of truly objective academic enquiry. We also recognise that the response of many to the central question and thus the raison d'être of the IISC's rationale may be:
"No. There are no important or replicable lessons to be learnt from the Cuban experience. It is a unique and idiosyncratic event in world history and its achievements, for what they were, must be seen as transient at best, non transferable and unsustainable."
Why the journal? Why now?
We believe that the question Why Cuba? Why Now? holds as much relevance to Cuba as to the rest of the developed and developing world as we all face the challenges of the first quarter of the twenty-first century. The International Journal of Cuban Studies is one of the academic vehicles through which this open analysis and discussion will occur. Our editorial and advisory boards are international in composition, with representatives from Europe and the Americas, including Cuban academics. The editorial board reflects the wide scope of the journal and already our deliberations are proving to be an iterative and reflective process as we each discuss and debate from our own perspective on the Cuba we all purport to know.
Professor Patrick Pietroni is Director of the International Institute for the Study of Cuba.
Copyright for this work is held jointly between Patrick Pietroni and the International Journal of Cuban Studies under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative 3.0 Licence
IJCS Volume 1 Issue 1 June 2008